Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you click and make a purchase, LegalStack Review may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend products we have thoroughly evaluated.
Why intake software matters more than most attorneys realize
Most solo attorneys lose 20 to 40 percent of their leads between the first inquiry and the signed retainer — not because of price or fit, but because the follow-up process is slow, manual, or nonexistent. A prospective client sends a contact form at 9 PM on a Tuesday. By Thursday morning, they've already hired someone who responded faster.
Client intake software fixes this by automating the repetitive parts of onboarding: sending the intake questionnaire, following up when it isn't completed, scheduling the consultation, and getting the retainer agreement signed. If you're currently doing these steps manually, the right tool can recover a meaningful percentage of leads without adding any staff.
Related guides and articles
Quick comparison
| Tool | Rating | Starting price | Automation | E-signature | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawmatics Top Pick | 8.8/10 | $89/mo | ✓ Full sequences | ✓ Built in | High intake volume |
| Clio Grow | 8.2/10 | Add-on to Clio | Limited | ✓ Built in | Existing Clio users |
| MyCase | 8.7/10 | $49/mo | Basic | ✓ Built in | Budget-conscious solos |
What to look for in client intake software
Not all intake tools are worth evaluating seriously. These are the four criteria that separate useful intake software from expensive overhead.
Intake form customization
Your intake form needs to capture the specific information your practice requires. Generic forms that can't be customized by practice area or matter type create more work downstream. Look for a builder that lets you create conditional logic — so a personal injury intake asks different questions than a family law intake — without requiring technical skills to set up.
Automated follow-up sequences
The single highest-value feature in any intake tool. When a prospective client fills out a form but doesn't schedule a consultation, the software should automatically send a follow-up email or text at a defined interval. When they schedule but don't show up, it should send a reminder. These automations require setup time upfront but run without any ongoing effort from you.
E-signature integration
Every intake workflow ends with a signed retainer. If your intake tool can't send the engagement letter and collect the e-signature in the same workflow, you're adding a manual step that breaks the automation. Lawmatics, Clio Grow, and MyCase all include e-signature. Verify the e-signature functionality meets your state bar's requirements for digital client consent before relying on it.
Integration with your practice management software
A new client who completes intake should appear in your matter management system automatically. Manual data entry between your intake tool and your practice management platform is where errors happen and time gets wasted. Lawmatics integrates directly with Clio; MyCase handles intake natively. If you're evaluating a standalone intake tool, confirm it integrates with whatever you use to manage active matters.