Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you click and sign up, LegalStack Review may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend tools we have personally evaluated.

The short answer

If you are choosing between Filevine and CasePeer for a personal injury practice, the honest bottom line: Filevine is the more powerful platform, CasePeer is the better fit for most solo and small firms. They are not really competing for the same buyer once you look closely.

Filevine wins on customization depth, automation, AI maturity, and the breadth of practice areas it supports. It is the platform a 20-attorney PI firm or a mass tort practice will choose. CasePeer wins on pricing, speed of implementation, and PI-specific workflow design out of the box. It is the platform a 1-to-5 attorney PI shop will be productive in within a week.

The rest of this comparison breaks down where each platform earns its keep, so you can match the right tool to your practice size and goals.

Who this comparison is for: Personal injury attorneys evaluating case management software, PI firms considering a switch from a current platform, and litigation practices weighing whether to commit to a deeper Filevine implementation. Pricing and features verified as of April 2026.

Pricing comparison

Pricing is the first place these platforms diverge. Filevine does not publish pricing publicly; CasePeer does. That alone tells you something about the buyer each platform is targeting.

Plan or Tier Filevine CasePeer Edge
Starting price ~$90/user/mo (custom quote) $69/user/mo (Essential) CasePeer wins
Mid-tier ~$130/user/mo (custom) $89/user/mo (Advanced) CasePeer wins
Premium / Enterprise ~$200+/user/mo (custom) Custom (call for quote) CasePeer wins
Implementation fee $5,000 to $25,000+ Included or minimal CasePeer wins clearly
Free trial Demo only, no trial Free demo and pilot available CasePeer wins
Annual discount Negotiable Standard 10 to 15 percent Tie

For a 5-attorney firm, the all-in difference is significant. CasePeer at $89/user/mo runs about $5,340/year for the firm. Filevine at $130/user/mo runs about $7,800/year, plus an implementation fee that often lands between $10,000 and $20,000 in year one. The Filevine premium pays back if you actually use the deeper customization. For a firm that just needs solid PI workflow, the Filevine spend never breaks even.

Feature comparison

Both platforms cover the core PI workflow: intake, case management, documents, calendaring, billing, and settlement tracking. Where they diverge is in depth and breadth.

Feature Filevine CasePeer Edge
PI-specific workflows ✓ Configurable templates ✓ Built-in default CasePeer wins
Document automation ✓ Advanced (Vinesign, ProjectFlow) ✓ Good Filevine wins
AI features Sidebar AI (chat, drafts, summaries) AI intake and document assist Filevine wins
Custom fields and forms Unlimited Limited but PI-tuned Filevine wins
Settlement calculator Custom build ✓ Built-in CasePeer wins
Medical records management ✓ Strong ✓ Strong, PI-focused Tie
Trust accounting Via QuickBooks integration Via QuickBooks integration Tie
Reporting and BI Filevine Periscope (advanced) Standard reporting Filevine wins
Mobile app Solid Solid Tie
Third-party integrations 100+ via marketplace ~30 essential integrations Filevine wins clearly
Multi-practice-area support ✓ Yes (PI, mass tort, family, etc.) PI only Filevine wins
Time to productive use 4 to 12 weeks (with implementation) 1 to 2 weeks CasePeer wins clearly

AI features compared

This is where 2026 buyers are paying the most attention, and it is where Filevine has built the larger lead.

Filevine Sidebar AI is a chat interface trained on your case data. You can ask questions like "Summarize the medical history on the Henderson matter" or "Draft a demand letter using the deposition testimony from the Garcia case" and get answers grounded in actual file content rather than the public web. Sidebar AI also generates discovery responses, intake summaries, and meeting notes from uploaded recordings. It is the most mature legal-AI feature shipping inside a case management platform today.

CasePeer's AI rollout is more recent and tighter in scope. The platform has shipped AI-assisted intake (auto-summarizing client calls and pulling key facts into the case file) and document automation (generating standard PI letters and forms from templates). The output quality is solid for the PI use case but the surface area is narrower than Filevine's. CasePeer is essentially adding AI features module by module rather than shipping a general-purpose case AI.

For firms that want to query case files conversationally or generate work product from existing case content, Filevine is meaningfully ahead. For firms that just want intake and document generation to feel less manual, CasePeer covers it.

Head-to-head scores

Category scores (out of 10)
PI workflow fit
Filevine
8.5
CasePeer
9.3
Customization
Filevine
9.6
CasePeer
7.0
AI & automation
Filevine
9.0
CasePeer
7.3
Ease of use
Filevine
7.5
CasePeer
9.0
Value for solo or small firm
Filevine
6.2
CasePeer
9.2

Pros and cons

Filevine

Pros
  • Deepest customization in the category
  • Sidebar AI is the most mature legal AI in case management
  • Filevine Periscope reporting is best in class for BI
  • 100+ third-party integrations via marketplace
  • Supports PI, mass tort, family law, criminal, and more
  • ProjectFlow workflows handle complex litigation timelines
Cons
  • Custom pricing tends to land 30 to 50 percent above CasePeer
  • Implementation fees of $5,000 to $25,000 are common
  • Steep learning curve, takes weeks to use productively
  • Power and depth can feel like overkill for solo PI shops
  • No public pricing or self-service trial

CasePeer

Pros
  • Built specifically for PI workflow out of the box
  • Settlement calculator and lien tracker built in
  • Transparent pricing starting at $69/user/mo
  • Productive within 1 to 2 weeks of signup
  • Implementation included or minimal cost
  • Strong fit for solo and small PI firms
Cons
  • PI only, not suitable for multi-practice-area firms
  • Customization is more limited than Filevine
  • AI features are newer and narrower in scope
  • Smaller integration ecosystem (~30 vs Filevine's 100+)
  • Reporting and BI are standard rather than advanced

Our final verdict

Choose Filevine if...

Your firm has 5+ attorneys, you handle PI plus other practice areas, you need deep customization to match a complex litigation workflow, or you want to put serious AI capability on top of your case data. The price premium and implementation overhead pay back when you actually use what you are buying. For a 10-attorney mass tort practice, Filevine is the right answer almost every time.

Choose CasePeer if...

You are a solo or small PI firm (1 to 10 attorneys), you want to be productive within two weeks of signup, you appreciate transparent pricing, and your practice is focused exclusively on personal injury. CasePeer covers the PI workflow well and at a price point that makes sense for the practice size. The settlement calculator alone is worth more than most solos realize until they use it.

Ready to try one?

Both platforms offer guided demos. Run the same intake scenario through each and the right fit will be obvious.

Visit Filevine → Try CasePeer Free →

CasePeer link is an affiliate link. We earn a commission if you subscribe. This does not affect our ratings or recommendations.

Frequently asked questions

Is Filevine or CasePeer better for a solo personal injury attorney?
CasePeer is the better fit for solo PI attorneys. The pricing is more accessible, the platform is built specifically for PI workflows out of the box, and the learning curve is shorter. Filevine is more powerful but its customization depth and implementation requirements make it overkill for a one-attorney shop. Most solos who try Filevine end up paying for capacity they never use.
Does Filevine or CasePeer have AI features in 2026?
Both platforms have shipped AI features. Filevine Sidebar AI lets attorneys query their case data conversationally and generate summaries, demand letters, and discovery responses grounded in actual case files. CasePeer has rolled out AI-assisted intake and document automation features more recently, with capabilities focused on the PI workflow specifically. Filevine's AI is more mature and broader in scope, while CasePeer's is tuned tighter to personal injury use cases.
How much does Filevine cost compared to CasePeer?
Filevine pricing is custom and not published, but firms typically report quotes in the $90 to $200 per user per month range depending on modules and contract length. CasePeer publishes pricing closer to $69 to $89 per user per month. For a 5-attorney firm, expect Filevine to land 30 to 50 percent higher in total cost of ownership, with the gap widening once implementation services are included.
Can Filevine handle non-PI practice areas?
Yes. While Filevine started in personal injury, the platform now supports mass tort, family law, criminal defense, immigration, business litigation, and several other practice areas through configurable templates. CasePeer remains personal-injury focused and does not market itself for other practice areas. If your firm handles multiple practice areas under one roof, Filevine is the more practical choice.
Which platform integrates better with QuickBooks and accounting tools?
Both integrate with QuickBooks Online for trust and operating account management. Filevine has a deeper integration ecosystem overall, with native connections to e-signature, deposition video, document automation, and BI tools. CasePeer covers the essentials, including QuickBooks and major payment processors, but the third-party ecosystem is meaningfully smaller. For accounting alone, both work fine. For broader tech-stack integration, Filevine wins.